KodeProof
Apply for private alpha

Workflow coverage

Start with refactors whose failure is expensive and whose contract can be declared.

KodeProof is not initially aimed at every code edit. Its first wedge is large, structurally risky JavaScript/TypeScript-family work where ordinary review and a passing build provide incomplete confidence.

↳

Monolith decomposition

Declare

  • owner file
  • target responsibilities
  • public entrypoints
  • initialization-sensitive bindings
  • allowed destination modules
  • complexity or size goal
  • direct-import requirement
  • project and behavior gates

KodeProof contribution: KodeProof can provide source-backed opportunities, reviewed grouping options, exact plan freshness, deterministic extraction where covered, direct consumer rewrites, cycle/re-export/orphan/order evidence, and candidate-only iteration.

Honest boundary: It must not invent the “correct” domain architecture merely to complete the task.

↳

Module or package move

Declare

  • exact source and destination ownership
  • public surface and value/type export roles
  • direct consumer rewrites
  • effect and initialization constraints

KodeProof contribution: Protect the public surface while changing physical ownership. Reject stale plans and undeclared compatibility bridges.

Honest boundary:

↳

Helper consolidation

Declare

  • declared uses
  • error behavior
  • side effects
  • timing
  • serialization
  • supported inputs

KodeProof contribution: Similar-looking helpers can differ in ways a passing build will not expose. Consolidation requires evidence that the declared uses can share one owner.

Honest boundary:

↳

Public CLI or package contract

Declare

  • commands
  • options
  • exports
  • imports maps
  • opaque files
  • messages
  • exit behavior
  • runtime load surfaces

KodeProof contribution: Change internals while preserving the contract that consumers use.

Honest boundary:

↳

Artifact or schema hard cut

Declare

  • producer
  • consumer
  • fixture
  • documentation
  • migration
  • multi-repository blast radius

KodeProof contribution: Coordinate the full bounded transition rather than leaving indefinite compatibility surfaces.

Honest boundary:

↳

Multi-repository change wave

Declare

  • per-repository immutable state
  • declared transition
  • evidence
  • transfer boundary
  • wave ordering

KodeProof contribution: Wave-level ordering cannot replace per-repository trust.

Honest boundary:

↳

Post-recovery cleanup

Declare

  • generated owners
  • retained vendor regions
  • provisional naming
  • structural debt
  • donor truth

KodeProof contribution: Supervise selected cleanup transactions after a recovery pipeline has established donor truth and an editable candidate.

Honest boundary:

Not the initial wedge

Open-ended improvement is not a transaction.

  • arbitrary feature development;
  • open-ended “improve this repo” prompts;
  • automatic dependency upgrades with no behavior contract;
  • code generation with no stable before-state or acceptance test;
  • unattended production merge;
  • languages and build systems current providers cannot inspect honestly.

Take the next step

Have one risky change with a real owner?

The private alpha is selecting for information quality and problem fit, not company size.

Apply for private alpha Contact Kalu Kode